Difference engines MZETZ250

ETZ(including Kanuni), ETS, ES, TS, IFA-RT, BK, Saxon,

Moderators: DAVID THOMPSON, phlat65

Difference engines MZETZ250

Postby Igordiver » Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:57 am

I’m in the proces of rebuilding my 1984 MZ ETZ 250. About 9 years ago I bought two bikes from a private seller, one in pretty good shape, which I managed to restore, the other for spare parts. I was never quite pleased with the way the way the restored one ran, so I took it apart again a few years back. I couldn’t find the time to take up the project again until now.
I’m trying to piece the best pieces of both engines together but it seems the two engines are different and this raises a few questions. One engine (engine n°: 1164203) has the external oil connection and one (engine n°: 1082331) has the internal oil connection.

Question 1: Can I use the same oil pump on both engines or are they different?

Both engines have a cylinder head but seem to be different in size. The cylinder head which matches engine 1082331 does not have a piston. The piston that matches the cylinder head of engine 1164203 is too big for the other cylinder head. Measuring the bore of engine 1082331 gives me a reading of approximately 68,6mm. Measuring the piston which fits the head of 1164203 gives me a reading of exactly 70mm.

Question 2: Is that the reason why the pistons have different numbers on this site?

https://mz-b.net/index.php?route=journal2/quickview&pid=2100000104901

https://mz-b.net/index.php?route=journal2/quickview&pid=2000000007465

https://mz-b.net/engine-and-parts/etz-250-piston-70-00-etz-250-2100000104925

https://mz-b.net/engine-and-parts/etz-250-piston-70-00-kit-etz-250-2000000007489


I can probably use the cylinder head from engine 1164203 on the case of 1082331 but…

Question 3: How do I know for sure the right size piston for both heads since my reading of 68,6 mm does not seem correct as the smallest diameter seems to be 69.

Attached are a lot of pictures of both engine cases and cylinder heads. I’m guessing the engine with the internal pump is the latter of the two and matches my 1984 MZ, so I would prefer to rebuild that one. (The one with the external pump also has a dent in the clutch-case.)

Can anyone shed some light?

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
1968 Triumph spitfire Mk3
1978 Porsche 928
1984 MZ ETZ250
2003 Triumph Daytona 600
Igordiver
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 10:28 am

Re: Difference engines MZETZ250

Postby Puffs » Fri Apr 10, 2020 5:41 am

Hi & welcome!

On your questions:
1) oil pump: don't know for sure. I understand they only used 1 single type of Mikuni oil pump, but I might be wrong. But I do not trust the pump & I have taken mine out. Premix.

2) Pistons: I think those numbers are just product numbers within their site. They sell items from all sorts of sources, and everything gets a unique product number. Please note there are many more vendors (viewtopic.php?f=5&t=9257&p=47896&sid=dd7bca9749d861dca2e4e65aa9895542#p47896). Best buy a good quality K20 alloy piston, and focus on the prescribed clearance if you have a rebore done. Search on this forum, there are a few threads on it.

There is also a thread on the different cylinder barrels, but I guess this says it all:
Unterschied ETZ 250-251 Zylinder.jpg
Unterschied ETZ 250-251 Zylinder.jpg (36.96 KiB) Viewed 16 times
The heads are probably the same, but you do need to measure the squish size = clearance with the piston crest. Again, maybe search. Are you sure you mean head, or cylinder = barrel?

3) On measuring pistons: see the Haynes manual (Blurredman's site) or the MZ manuals (Miraculis.de), but you are using the wrong tool, and seem to measure at the wrong place (measure the piston about 2cm above the base of the skirt with a micrometer).

On the differences between the casings, and which is latest: that I do not know either. Mine is a '89 EM251, and it had an external oil injection pipe (internal pump, like both yours). Use the best, but maybe better not mix casing halves.


Good luck & whereabouts in B are you?
Last edited by Puffs on Mon Jan 06, 2025 8:29 am, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Puffs
Moderator
 
Posts: 2010
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:20 am
Location: Ardennes, Belgium.

Re: Difference engines MZETZ250

Postby Igordiver » Sat Apr 11, 2020 1:58 am

Thank you for the welcome and the answers Puffs. I live north of Antwerp, you are situated in the glorious Ardennes so it seems. Every year in oktober we have a long weekend in Bütgenbach en when Porsche was still racing in the WEC-championship we would spend 4 days at Spa-Francorchamps, lets be honest, the most beautiful race-track in the world. I’m not a religious man but if I would have to seek the almighty’s throne, Eau Rouge would be my place to start. :-D

I’ve managed to come up with some answers by reading the workshop manual. It made clear what the different sizes are all about, strangely though the vendor seems to sell pistons up to 75 mm. But at least now I know what to do. I will probably use the cylinder with the matching piston I have already.

Could have checked the WSM but I was to lazy to read it and hoping someone would know the answer on this forum :-D I’ve printed the WSM when I started the project many years ago but most pics are a bit dark so it’s not always clear. Because I didn’t work that much on this project I’m feeling a bit rusty, I’ll manage to get going though.
I did buy the Haynes manual but there was no explanation of the different piston-types, but it will definitely be useful in the future.

Might start a restoration-thread one of these days. Cheers!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
1968 Triumph spitfire Mk3
1978 Porsche 928
1984 MZ ETZ250
2003 Triumph Daytona 600
Igordiver
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 10:28 am

Re: Difference engines MZETZ250

Postby Puffs » Sat Apr 11, 2020 5:23 am

It looks like the illicit duo van Ranst & van Gucht will give you plenty of time to work on your bike. At any rate, I have taken a front wheel apart yesterday, to rejuvenate it. Something I've been wanting to do for 20 years.

Yes, Francorchamps is quite possibly the most beautiful race track in the world, for the rider/driver at least. Due to the differences in elevation, diversity in corners & straights. For the record, Le Raidillon de l'Eau Rouge (in '97):
Eau_Rouge_1997.jpg
I was fortunate enough to ride a few sessions on it, with a Panigale V4, and live about 25km from the track, near Vielsalm. But of course all of the Ardennes are magnificent for riding, and it wouldn't surprise me if, at some stage, you drove past my house with your Spitfire or Porsche. Those types of cars have a habit of doing that.

You don't say in what sense you're not quite pleased with the way the restored one ran. If it was because it was loud, possible causes are: small end, big end, and too much clearance piston-barrel, causing piston slap. Clutch & gearbox are other possible sources, but less common. Anyway, it looks like you have ample documentation. Note that Haynes and the other manuals always assume you install original pistons; maybe viewtopic.php?f=5&t=10263&sid=3490728d9a1e0d807aed02af7ef9be4c#p50731 might also be relevant for you.

Yes, please do start a restoration thread on it!
Last edited by Puffs on Mon Jan 06, 2025 8:29 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Puffs
Moderator
 
Posts: 2010
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:20 am
Location: Ardennes, Belgium.

Re: Difference engines MZETZ250

Postby Blurredman » Sat Apr 11, 2020 11:31 am

For a start, as you have detected. One of those engine's has an internal oil galley.
It is an older type. Years and numbers are unknown but I personally think that these internal controlled oil galleys are the bikes from 81-83 ish. Coinciding with the sale of pre-mix models (with the disc brakes AND a tacho!). At least in the UK and most of Western European countries the non-('luxus' models as they were known) were soon removed for sale. Perhaps due to lack of demand? They carried on the non-luxus models in Eastern Europe for long after '83 ish however.

During this time I think they decided to cut the costs, by creating this 'external' line because it was a lot cheaper than the casting process of the internal galley on the clutch cover, but also the machining into the crankcase too. Also... The external pipe gives one positive however.. You can clearly see whether the oil is getting from the oil pump to the crankcase... A quick visual 'yes the oil is pumping'.. When the internal galley was replaced with external tube? I don't rightly know..

I wouldn't say both those pumps are interchangable however- the outside tube type obviously has different way of getting the oil back up to the outside of the case, whereas the earlier one would seem to fit directly on the inlet for the oil in that compartment. I don't have an internal galley oil pump so I don't have experience there. You can see the inlet in the picture however.


Just for the purposes of other people's interest (puffs), please would you make a picture of the inner side of the internal oil clutch cover?

Interestingly- I have one myself that I bought as a replacement for a mesed up cover on one of my bikes... And I never took a picture so I could never show those who were interested and found nothing on the internet. This would be an opportune time to get a reference picture! Pleeease 8) 8) 8)



Oil pumps: As far as i'm aware there was only one model of pump used from 81 until mz's demise. However I am unsure. However, I can see no reason why they would be interchangable. I myself also have two on my shelf- I have them removed also. I wouldn't worry about the nay-sayers and the heresay that is spouted around concerning the oil pump removal and the running of the engine post removal regarding "running lean" etc. Even the factory book does not have a differentiation of settings or jet sizes between oil pump and pre-mix models. There is only a 2% less petrol being put through the system in place of oil. I myself have gone 15,000 miles on my 251 and 10,000 miles on my 250.


Pistons: Official piston oversizes only go up three. 68.6 I do believe is the size of the piston. 69 would be size of the bore.
However like Puffs has said- those pistons are cheap. Both he and I have had experience with those cheap pistons produced by an Indian company 'RAM'. Personally I haven't had issues with them, but then my wear seems to be considerably less- maybe because my cylinder rebore shop actually re-bored to the size I told them too.. :lol: :lol: :roll:
Both my Mz's have those cheapo RAM pistons in them, and each machine has done 4,000 miles since installation.. One of the bikes is still silent as a Honda 90, but the other is not silent, but I am not regarding the piston to be the issue there.
1973 MZ ES250/2 - 17,000 miles
1979 Suzuki TS185ER - 10,000 miles
1981 Honda CX500B - 91,000 miles
1987 MZ ETZ300 - 39,000 miles
1989 MZ ETZ251 - 50,000 miles

ftp://blurredmanswebsite.ddns.net/Vehicle_Documents/MZ_Documents/
User avatar
Blurredman
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 3:59 pm
Location: South Wales

Re: Difference engines MZETZ250

Postby Puffs » Sun Apr 12, 2020 4:39 am

It's odd, but you must be right: it does seem that the later models, like mine, had the external oil line. Possibly it was difficult to control the quality & seal of the internal galley? Or indeed, just cheaper - difficult = expensive. But 'seeing the oil flow' in that external pipe is not really an advantage: you don't see any flow. You might see that line as being filled with oil, depending on the colour, but you wont see it flow. The flow rate is very little anyway. And if ever you were to run out of oil, not sure you'd see bubbles; it's a centrifugal pump I believe.

I can imagine that in the internal galley model, the pump output line taps into that internal galley, rather than going through a hole to the outside. And then I guess there has to be something mating onto the LH case half - potential for an unseen leak...?

Logic/physics dictates that if you take out the pump and than add 2% (or 3%) of oil to the petrol, the carb will administer less petrol to the engine. Maybe the amount of liquid (now petrol/oil premix, previously only petrol) administered by the venturi will be the same, at corresponding air flow rates, but that liquid will now contain less petrol. And also, the viscosity of the liquid will become marginally higher when you add oil to it, which is will reduce the liquid flow through the jets (at the same ΔP) a bit. And then finally, under combustion oil may also burn to some extend (ever seen any carbon in a head or exhaust?), and thereby also take oxygen (but at a different rate as petrol does). Of course this happens to the oil in the premix, as well as to the oil previously injected, so this too may have an effect. Although all of these differences are quite small, one should consider this & consciously look for any lean/rich jetting issues after taking the pump out. I found it slightly lean & put a slightly bigger main jet, but not much & maybe in summer I'll go smaller again. At any rate, I did some 22k miles with a pump, and now some 3k without (recently with another carb altogether).
Last edited by Puffs on Mon Jan 06, 2025 8:29 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Puffs
Moderator
 
Posts: 2010
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:20 am
Location: Ardennes, Belgium.

Re: Difference engines MZETZ250

Postby Igordiver » Sun Apr 12, 2020 7:22 am

Thank you both very very much for the info on the MZ!!! @ Puffs, thank you for the Eau Rouge picture. Racing a Panigale V4 around Spa must have been amazing!!!
@ Blurredman, thank you for putting al those docs online. It will keep my books clean but my keyboard greasy (which is cleanable :-D)

This is what it looks like for the internal pump on my ETZ.

Image

I found this in a Dutch publication, the engine with the internal pump indeed seems to be the older one.

Image

Looking at the drawings it looks like there's two different pumps but when searching online indeed one can only find one type of Mikuni pump.

Image
1968 Triumph spitfire Mk3
1978 Porsche 928
1984 MZ ETZ250
2003 Triumph Daytona 600
Igordiver
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 10:28 am

Re: Difference engines MZETZ250

Postby Puffs » Mon Apr 13, 2020 5:13 am

Well, I rode that bike on a track day, or Bikers Day as they call it http://www.bikersdays.com/en/circuits/c ... ncorchamps. But yes indeed, it was a magnificent experience, and it's the fastest bike I've ever ridden. At 280 it takes a bit of attention to decide when to brake for the corner (Les Combes). Magnificent power & handling, possibly faster than anything else on the track. Probably too fast for me.

Ta for your pic & that publication. The pump in your pic looks identical to mine, except for the connection of the exit line. The publication confirms my suspicion; a 6mm line on yours connecting to the internal galley, and a 3mm one on mine:
MZ oilpump (external injection line).jpg
MZ oilpump (external injection line).jpg (41.44 KiB) Viewed 16 times
connecting to the external line. With some effort you might be able to convert between the 2 methonds, maybe you can take out that connecting mandrel & replace it by something else. But: I took mine out, see viewtopic.php?f=5&t=9988&p=50155&sid=60e89cb83eabf350cf59ee0913d40a09#p50385.
User avatar
Puffs
Moderator
 
Posts: 2010
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:20 am
Location: Ardennes, Belgium.


Return to Vintage Motorcycles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests