raptor vs MZ comparison

Black Panther/Street Moto, Baghira, Enduro, Mastiff, Skorpion Traveller and Tour.

Moderators: DAVID THOMPSON, phlat65

raptor vs MZ comparison

Postby frederickflintstone » Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:22 pm

In a side-by-side comparison of a raptor motor and an MZ motor there are differences that become apparent. The outer cases are similar but different. The cylinder in the raptor is noticeably canted forward. The head and cylinder appear to be the same. I hope these photos help with anyone needing to make a comparison.
raptor1.JPG
raptor1.JPG (71.28 KiB) Viewed 2985 times
raptor2.JPG
raptor2.JPG (51.59 KiB) Viewed 2986 times
raptor3.JPG
raptor3.JPG (51.45 KiB) Viewed 2986 times
User avatar
frederickflintstone
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 7:25 pm

Re: raptor vs MZ comparison

Postby Bill Jurgenson » Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:36 am

The 5 valve engines are basically identical. the angle of installation is irrelevant.
What is different:
-the right side covers are different and they are not interchangable. Too bad, too, since the spin-on oil filter of the Raptor is definitely an improvement. This can probably be seen as catering to the US market.
-the crankshaft. The left crankstub has a different taper. The generator rotor used in the raptor is different, smaller. The cranks are interchangable however and the porkchop style crank of the Raptor runs just fine in the XTZ engine. You need the rotor to go with it and, easiest, the left sidecover including generator and starter as well.
-the carb. Te Raptor has a dual CV carb, not the register carb you are familar with. It will work with the XTZ engine of course as well and vice versa.
-CDI. The Raptor has a different ignition. Both ignitions work with both engines as long as they are transplanted entirely.

Otherwise, there are no differences.

The new 4 valve engine is a whole other kettle of fish. The mounting points are the same however.
User avatar
Bill Jurgenson
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:30 am
Location: D-74348 Lauffen am Neckar

Re: raptor vs MZ comparison

Postby fozzymz » Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:28 am

Thanks for the pictures Fred,

I bought a Raptor 5 valve 102mm piston and cometic gasket set. The vendor assured me they'll fit.

Thanks for posting the info.
fozzymz
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 4:37 pm

Re: raptor vs MZ comparison

Postby keithcross » Sat Mar 29, 2008 2:24 pm

Bill

Just looked at the thread and you have obviously tried this out. I thioght the gearbox was a little different as well. I thought the splines for the engine sprocket were different.
It would be interesting to fit the later 4 valve Yamaha motor into the MZ though, especially the version used for the Aprillia Strada that I also ride.
The differences between the Arilia Pegaso Strada and the MZ Baghira are:
The 4 valve motor seems to build up revs a lot quicker
The 4 valve motor seems to make a little more power.
The 5 valve motor seems to give a lot better bottom end response
The 5 valve motor is a lot smoother in operation. The Aprilia and I understand Yamaha seem to have problems with snatchenesss at about 3000rpm.
The MZ handles better than the Aprilia in the twisties
The Aprilia does marginally better gas mileage (on average about 5mpg better)
Both bikes are a lot different to each other, but I still prefer the MZ.

Keith
Ride it like you stole it
keithcross
 
Posts: 922
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Hampshire England

Re: raptor vs MZ comparison

Postby Bill Jurgenson » Sun Mar 30, 2008 12:55 am

The things you don't like about the new engine are due to the injection mapping which they still haven't sorted out.

Basically, the 4 valve engine is a better design, some things like the cam and valvetrain are much better. The engine is quite a bit lighter as well because the crank is lighter and because the cylinder does not have a cast iron liner.
The change to 4 valves has, apart from cheaper manufacturing, really only one reason: dual plugs. The engine doesn't have this (yet) but the provisions were made. that and the injection are necessary to meet immission requirements. Performance played no part in development. From that aspect, the 5 valve combustion chamber is much better.
If you stick a good 39 or 40mm carb on your Aprilia and spend some time sorting it out, it should be much better than it is now.
Of course if you stick a better set of carbs on the MZ, it will run circles around the other thing.
User avatar
Bill Jurgenson
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:30 am
Location: D-74348 Lauffen am Neckar

Re: raptor vs MZ comparison

Postby keithcross » Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:03 am

Bill

Have to agree on the mapping, but owners on other forums are fitted a Power Commander III, and are claiming that this sorts it out and gives a setting that emulates an accelerator pump sometimes fitted to carbs. At under £200 if you import from the states yourself, its a cheaper option than a big carb.
Mind you I haven't tried a bike with a PCIII fitted, and I always wonder if these fixes really work, or ether spending £200 clouds ones judgment a little :)

Keith
Ride it like you stole it
keithcross
 
Posts: 922
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Hampshire England

Re: raptor vs MZ comparison

Postby hb7 » Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:06 am

hb7
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 10:27 pm
Location: Los Angeles


Return to 660 cc

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 397 guests